<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Sue Weaver C.A.U.S.E.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sueweavercause.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sueweavercause.org</link>
	<description>Consumer Awareness of Unsafe Employment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:19:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on EEOC, were they really listening? by Fred</title>
		<link>http://sueweavercause.org/eeoc-were-they-really-listening/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sueweavercause.org/?p=1289#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Ben,
I agree that &quot;social policy should not be made on emotionally charged stories.&quot;  It should be made with facts.  Lucia Bone presented a relevent set of facts that often get lost when emotionally charged stories are told about those with convictions being unable to find jobs.  I hope you noted that Lucia Bone clarified her remarks with the statement &quot;There is a job for everyone… but not all jobs are for everyone.&quot;  

We need to help ex-offenders gain suitable employment, and we need to recognize if and when offenses are relevant to consider in making a hiring decision, but in doing so we also need to recognize the fact that not every job is appropriate for everyone.  

Wouldn&#039;t you agree that we must take responsibility for those we hire to ensure we do not make negligent and tragic decisions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben,<br />
I agree that &#8220;social policy should not be made on emotionally charged stories.&#8221;  It should be made with facts.  Lucia Bone presented a relevent set of facts that often get lost when emotionally charged stories are told about those with convictions being unable to find jobs.  I hope you noted that Lucia Bone clarified her remarks with the statement &#8220;There is a job for everyone… but not all jobs are for everyone.&#8221;  </p>
<p>We need to help ex-offenders gain suitable employment, and we need to recognize if and when offenses are relevant to consider in making a hiring decision, but in doing so we also need to recognize the fact that not every job is appropriate for everyone.  </p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t you agree that we must take responsibility for those we hire to ensure we do not make negligent and tragic decisions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEOC, were they really listening? by Ben</title>
		<link>http://sueweavercause.org/eeoc-were-they-really-listening/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 20:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sueweavercause.org/?p=1289#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Social policy must not be based on emotionally charged stories.  For every Sue Weaver story, there are hundreds of good hard working people being denied the right to earn a living over misdemeanors having no correlation towards fitness to perform a fair day&#039;s work for a fair day&#039;s wage.

When society accepts injustice for many as the necessary consequence of an injustice suffered by a single individual, we all lose and ill-will prevails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social policy must not be based on emotionally charged stories.  For every Sue Weaver story, there are hundreds of good hard working people being denied the right to earn a living over misdemeanors having no correlation towards fitness to perform a fair day&#8217;s work for a fair day&#8217;s wage.</p>
<p>When society accepts injustice for many as the necessary consequence of an injustice suffered by a single individual, we all lose and ill-will prevails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEOC, were they really listening? by Hunter</title>
		<link>http://sueweavercause.org/eeoc-were-they-really-listening/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 18:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sueweavercause.org/?p=1289#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Hello,

From what I read, your letter is reasonable to post to the EEOC Commission regarding employment.  I don&#039;t believe that criminals, hardened or not, should be allowed to work jobs that involve customer relations or participate in services that have a client base.  In fact, I believe that the more offenses a criminal has on his rap sheet, the harder it is for him to find a job.

In particular, I can only find a good job for a criminal working in prison, labor jobs that group criminals by sex and out in the middle of nowhere, no homes within miles.

A tragic death Sue Weaver had and it proves that we need guns, weapons in our own home and on our persons.  We should be evidently ready to meet any incident that happens, and that means shooting them down before it happens.

Guns are not the only defense. So are background checks.  Isolation of hardened criminals to job sectors they must work in without risks to others are another.

It&#039;s a shame how companies are not doing more to help protect their clients, customers, etc.  If I ran 50 companies today, I would still REQUIRE background checks or the manager and the people he hired would be fired, laid off, or disciplined for not adhering to my strict standards of how a company runs, should be made into, etc.

I hope the cause you have devised helps everyone, incites other businesses to join and I would gladly join this cause with my own businesses should I build them from the ground up.  Not only honest products are my main focus when it comes to businesses, so are the safety of my clients and customers!

Thanks for bringing this to me online.  I thought the EEOC would help me when I faced problems at work because of my disability but their laziness, lack of prompt response or use of your letter in your commission made me realize I just cannot trust an inactive body who cannot see reason.

Above all, do not trust government for your sole protection.  Trust in yourself and your gun, but first and foremost God.

Thanks,

Hunter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>From what I read, your letter is reasonable to post to the EEOC Commission regarding employment.  I don&#8217;t believe that criminals, hardened or not, should be allowed to work jobs that involve customer relations or participate in services that have a client base.  In fact, I believe that the more offenses a criminal has on his rap sheet, the harder it is for him to find a job.</p>
<p>In particular, I can only find a good job for a criminal working in prison, labor jobs that group criminals by sex and out in the middle of nowhere, no homes within miles.</p>
<p>A tragic death Sue Weaver had and it proves that we need guns, weapons in our own home and on our persons.  We should be evidently ready to meet any incident that happens, and that means shooting them down before it happens.</p>
<p>Guns are not the only defense. So are background checks.  Isolation of hardened criminals to job sectors they must work in without risks to others are another.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame how companies are not doing more to help protect their clients, customers, etc.  If I ran 50 companies today, I would still REQUIRE background checks or the manager and the people he hired would be fired, laid off, or disciplined for not adhering to my strict standards of how a company runs, should be made into, etc.</p>
<p>I hope the cause you have devised helps everyone, incites other businesses to join and I would gladly join this cause with my own businesses should I build them from the ground up.  Not only honest products are my main focus when it comes to businesses, so are the safety of my clients and customers!</p>
<p>Thanks for bringing this to me online.  I thought the EEOC would help me when I faced problems at work because of my disability but their laziness, lack of prompt response or use of your letter in your commission made me realize I just cannot trust an inactive body who cannot see reason.</p>
<p>Above all, do not trust government for your sole protection.  Trust in yourself and your gun, but first and foremost God.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Hunter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

